John Freshwater is a menace 2

The Panda’s Thumb has been keeping a close tab on Ohio science teacher/religious fanatic John Freshwater even since he got into trouble last year, allegedly burning a cross on a student’s arm with a Tesla coil.

Freshwater and school officials have been making their cases in adiministrative hearings since then. There have been six days of testimony so far, spread over several months. So far, the testimony suggests Freshwater was an insubordinate teacher who resisted his superiors’ efforts to bring him in line, perhaps because he believed God’s authority trumped theirs.

Members of the science department were supposed to bring their Tesla coils to the front office; Freshwater kept his. He was supposed to remove his Bible from plain sight of students; he put additional religious materials in his classroom instead. Ohio’s scope and sequence of science instruction places the teaching of evolution in the 8th grade and later, and forbids the teaching of creationism; Freshwater was telling his seventh graders that evolution was bunk, that the world was only 6,000 years old, and that humans and dinosaurs co-existed for a time.

Freshwater, who apparently is a very popular teacher and has won teaching awards in the past, is associated with rightwing Christian organizations, particularly the kind that just can’t seem to accept that old “separation of church and state” idea enshrined in the Constitution. They try to weasel their church teachings into the public schools in defiance of federal (and state) law anyway.

As a science teacher, my opinion is that Freshwater is a loose cannon on deck, and should be tossed overboard. Regardless of his extreme Christian belief, he has clearly abused his authority as a classroom teacher and has abused a captive audience of middle school students mentally and psychologically. He does not belong in a science classroom — any science classroom. That he was allowed to keep his job as long as he has is a disgrace.

Possibly Related Posts:

2 thoughts on “John Freshwater is a menace

  1. Reply kdeets Feb 19,2009 8:26 pm

    “separation of church and state” isn’t mentioned in the constitution. It’s in a letter from Jefferson. Let’s get our facts straight.

  2. Reply eljefe Feb 28,2009 8:59 pm

    Yes, let’s do. Read the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    It was the intent of the Founding Fathers that the State (our federal government), unlike the States of Europe, not impose any one particular religion on the population. If you know any American history, you will know that groups of people (Puritans, Quakers, Huguenots, Jews) came to the colonies so they could worship in their own way without fear of being arrested, imprisoned or put to death. Regardless of their own religious beliefs, Jefferson and his peers wanted religion free from government control.

    The US Supreme Court in subsequent years has interpreted the Establishment Clause to mean that no publicly funded institution (Freshwater’s school, for example) can favor one religion over another. Freshwater was in fact doing exactly that in his sciences classes, as well as being irresponsible with high voltage equipment.

    Sure, the phrase “separation of church and state” is not in the Constitution. Neither is “liberty and justice for all,” or “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” What’s your point?

Leave a Reply




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WP Facebook Auto Publish Powered By :